Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 1295 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3930T - 273 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
