Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 407 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 34% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €39.9 vs €60.9
- Up to 33% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - €0.24 vs €0.36 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13477 minutes ago
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel LGA1150 Processore Pentium G3250 da 3.2GHz, 54W, Grigio
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13477 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
