Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1509 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - €60.9 vs €1017.42
- Up to 93% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-10920X - €0.29 vs €4.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 17% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3900 - 244 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
208
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
6%
Price, €
€1017.42
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,017.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Skylake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |