Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G3900 vs Core i3-3250

Celeron G3900 vs Core i3-3250: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 814 days newer than Core i3-3250.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than Core i3-3250 - 678 vs 676 FPS
  • Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 51 vs 55 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Rocket League.
Rocket League

Rocket League

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

678

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.09/FPS

100%

Price, €

€60.9

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray

Buy for 60.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 17053 minutes ago

Intel Core i3-3250 Logo
Core i3-3250

Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013


FPS

676

99%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Intel Core i3-3250 Logo
Core i3-3250

Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

87%

Intel Core i3-3250 Logo
Core i3-3250

Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013


Single-Core

532

91%

Multi-Core

1130

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

vs
Intel Core i3-3250 Logo

Intel Core i3-3250

Sep 1st, 2015
Release DateJun 9th, 2013
CeleronCollectionCore i3
SkylakeCodenameIvy Bridge
Intel Socket 1151SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
2Threads
4
2.8 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
51 W
TDP55 W
14 nm
Process Size22 nm
28.0xMultiplier
35.0x
Intel HD 510Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 2500
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.