Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1304 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-3250 - 147 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |