Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1282 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
