Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 14 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6200 - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |