Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3369 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7500F - €72.66 vs €254.29
- Up to 48% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 5 7500F - €1.65 vs €3.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 82% better in Starfield than Celeron G1840 - 80 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
44
55.00000000000001%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3817 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.18/FPS
51.886792452830186%
Price, €
€254.29
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €254.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
18.403790087463555%
Multi-Core
854
6.775626785147572%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |