Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2705 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 55 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 9% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G1620 - 180 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |