Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1002 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1620 - 208 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |