Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 147 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 82% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1620 - 40 vs 22 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 47 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
