Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2227 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1620 - 235 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |