Buy on Amazon
€254.09
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 406 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1620 - 156 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-2700K Processore Sandy Bridge (3,5GHz, L3-Cache, Sockel 1155)
Buy for €254.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
61.596385542168676%
Multi-Core
723
31.934628975265017%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
