Buy on Amazon
€276
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800 is 2962 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800
- Performs up to 12% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1620 - 122 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 7 5800 XT Processore 8 Core/16 Thread, Architettura Zen 3, 36 MB di Cache L3, TDP di 105 W, Boost di Frequenza Fino a 4,8 GHz, Socket AM4, DDR4 e PCIe 4.0, Ventole Wraith Prism
Buy for €276 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 5800
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
