Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1620 - 259 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €335.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
15.53951367781155%
Multi-Core
723
4.898705874381734%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |