Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9500 is 2146 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-9500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Celeron G1620 - 202 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
27.86103542234332%
Multi-Core
723
14.488977955911825%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-9500 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |