Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2239 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 27% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron B830 - 130 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 24 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |