Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2604 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 21% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron B830 - 116 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 20 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
