Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1126 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 35 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron B820 - 133 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |