Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1096 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 35 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Apex Legends than Celeron B820 - 278 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
278
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |