Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 3208 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 5300G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron B820 - 209 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
