Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1308 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 35 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron B815 - 235 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |