Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3362 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron B815 - 204 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |