Buy on Amazon
€22.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 81 days older than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Celeron B815 - 232 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
