Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2561 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron 3965U - 177 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 16 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€234.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €234.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |