Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1402 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 38% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron 3965U - 241 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 12 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
241
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €133.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |