Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 1185 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 15 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Celeron 3865U - 185 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 16 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
