Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2098 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 1000M - 353 vs 313 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 20 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
