Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 130 vs 117 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 105 vs 165 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 10 | Cores | 10 |
| 20 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
