Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2745 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron 1000M - 431 vs 363 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 20 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
431
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€342.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €342.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |