Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3646 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 439% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron 1000M - 97 vs 18 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 24 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€375
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |