Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4005 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron 1000M - 225 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |