Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Alan Wake 2 than EPYC 7742 - 134 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 120 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€466.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €466.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7398 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7742 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rome | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |