Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1532 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7742 - 166 vs 125 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€471.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7564 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7742 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |