The EPYC 7401P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7401P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 65 vs 170 Watts
EPYC 7401P vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Average FPS
173
91%
Min 1% FPS
116
92%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, €
€319.62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
EPYC 7401P vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7401P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 170 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
