Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 468 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13600KF.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13600KF - 168 vs 167 FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €258.88 vs €675.80
- Up to 61% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-14900F - €1.55 vs €4.02 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €675.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€258.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |