Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-14900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 83 days older than the more expensive Core i9-14900F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-14900F - 234 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €471.07 vs €679.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-14900F - €2.01 vs €2.93 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €679.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€471.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |