Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-13900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-13900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 8 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-13900F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €565.12 vs €630.99
- Up to 6% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900KS - €2.73 vs €2.89 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900F - 218 vs 207 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
95%
Value, €/FPS
€2.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€565.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €565.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.89/FPS
94%
Price, €
€630.99
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €630.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900F | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 150 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |