Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-13900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-13900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the cheaper Core i9-13900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €495.99 vs €673.23
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €1.03 vs €1.39 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900F - 485 vs 480 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
480
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€495.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €495.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1814 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
485
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
74%
Price, €
€673.23
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €673.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1814 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900F | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |