Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900F - 216 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €276.66 vs €494.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900 - €1.36 vs €2.29 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €494.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€276.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €276.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900 | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |