Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €363.14 vs €480.04
- Up to 21% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-13900KF - €1.53 vs €1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Core i9-11900F - 247 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€363.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €363.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5211 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
247
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
79%
Price, €
€480.04
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €480.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5211 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900F | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |