Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2310 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Core i7-6900K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €199.97 vs €520.00
- Up to 52% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 7950X - €1.17 vs €2.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6900K - 214 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
80%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6900K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |