Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2310 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Core i7-6900K
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €199.97 vs €365.83
- Up to 42% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-13700K - €1.27 vs €2.19 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6900K - 167 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
157
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
58%
Price, €
€365.83
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €365.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6900K | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |