Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1405 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 17% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6700T - 391 vs 334 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - €85.00 vs €182.45
- Up to 60% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6700T - €0.22 vs €0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7315 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
391
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7589 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700T | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |