Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 2407 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700T - 140 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - €98.00 vs €180.57
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700T - €0.70 vs €1.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €180.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700T | vs | Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |