Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €186.84 vs €719.98
- Up to 69% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €1.44 vs €4.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-6700 - 156 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
130
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €186.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6854 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.62/FPS
31%
Price, €
€719.98
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7128 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |