Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3781 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Core i7-4930K
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - €182.45 vs €367.22
- Up to 30% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-14700F - €1.13 vs €1.61 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 42% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-4930K - 228 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 28 vs 12 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
161
71%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1305 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
70%
Price, €
€367.22
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €367.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1305 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4930K | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |