Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 369 days older than the cheaper Core i7-14700F.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €367.22 vs €719.98
- Up to 46% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.91 vs €1.70 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 5% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-14700F - 423 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
404
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€367.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €367.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6817 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
54%
Price, €
€719.98
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6818 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |