Buy on Amazon
€520
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $303
Availability
MSRP $303
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $699
Availability
MSRP $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3404 days newer than Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4765T - 162 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Amd Ryzen 9 7950X Processore, 16 Core/32 Thread Sfrenati, Architettura Zen 4, 80 Mb L3 Cache, Nero, 4 x 4 x 0.27 cm; 79.38 grammi
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4765T | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
