In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4765T is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-11900K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $78 more expensive!
Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 16% cheaper – $420.99 vs $498.95
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.97 vs $7.55/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-11900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
66 FPS
62%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
61%
Price, $
$498.95
84%
Value, $/FPS
$7.55/FPS
53%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
106 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
80 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $539.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
